Business Standard
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009
 
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
Feedback | RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
||||Economy & Policy||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Today's Paper | Features & Analysis | Politics & Public Affairs | Q&A | Columnists | BS Says
Home > Economy & Policy Live Markets | Smart Portfolios II
  Search:
The Arjun battle tank acquires a growing fan club
Ajai Shukla / New Delhi June 16, 2008, 0:45 IST

India's own Arjun tank is finally proving its worth. Despite continuing criticism from an army establishment that judges the Arjun far more strictly than foreign purchases like the T-90, the Arjun is successfully completing a gruelling 5,000-kilometre trial in the Rajasthan desert.

During six months of trials, the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO), along with tank crews from the army's 43 Armoured Regiment, have proved not just the Arjun's endurance, but also the ability of its computer-controlled gun to consistently blow away suitcase-sized targets placed more than a kilometre away.

The army's Directorate General of Mechanised Forces (DGMF), which must eventually okay the tank, is not impressed but key decision-makers are rallying behind the Arjun.

The head of the Pune-based Southern Command, Lieutenant General N Thamburaj, strongly backs the Arjun. On a visit to the Mahajan Field Firing Ranges in Rajasthan to watch his troops exercising, Lt Gen Thamburaj noticed the Arjun firing nearby.

After walking across, he was invited by the DRDO team to drive and fire the tank. Half an hour later, the general was an Arjun backer; two holes in the target he aimed at testified that a soldier without previous experience operating tanks could get into the Arjun and use it effectively.

Business Standard has evidence of many more such incidents. On June 29, 2006, the commander of the elite 33 Armoured Division, Major General BS Grewal, visited the Mahajan Ranges along with a colleague, Major General Shiv Jaswal. Both drove and fired the Arjun for the first time that day; the two rounds that each fired punched holes through targets almost two kilometres away.

That same month, 43 Armoured Regiment, which is the first army tank unit equipped with the Arjun, pronounced itself delighted with the Arjun's firing performance. After firing trials in summer 2006, 43 Armoured Regiment endorsed: "The accuracy and consistency of the Arjun have been proved beyond doubt."

But the establishment was quick to strike back. Barely three months after that report, the commanding officer of 43 Armoured Regiment, Colonel D Thakur, was confronted by the then Director General of Mechanised Forces, Lt Gen DS Shekhawat. Eyewitnesses describe how he was upbraided for "not conducting the trials properly". But in a career-threatening display of professional integrity, Colonel Thakur's brigade commander, Brigadier Chandra Mukesh, intervened to insist that the trials had been conducted correctly.

In a series of interviews with the army, including the present Director General of Mechanised Forces, Lt Gen D Bhardwaj, and with the MoD top brass, Business Standard has learned that opposition to the Arjun remains deeply entrenched. This despite the soldiers of 43 Armoured Regiment declaring that if it came to war, they would like to be in an Arjun.

Minister of State for Defence Production, Rao Inderjeet Singh recounts: "I've spoken, off the record, to officers who have gone through the trials. Even the crews (from 43 Armoured Regiment)… who have been testing the tank… I forced them to choose between the Russian tanks and the Arjun.

I said, you've driven this tank and you've driven that tank (the T-90). Now mark them out of ten, which tank is better? And I've found that the Arjun tank was given more numbers than the T-90 tank."

With new confidence, the Arjun's developer, the Central Vehicles R&D Establishment (CVRDE), is arguing strongly for "comparative trials", in which the Arjun would be pitted head-to-head, in identical conditions, with the army's T-90 and T-72 tanks. But the DGMF continues to resist any such face-off.

Arrow Other Stories     
- Sensex makes remarkable recovery, regains 17K
- S C Kalia takes over as Union Bank ED
- PNB may acquire majority stake in Kazakh bank
- Maoist hindering land acquisition for Tata steel project: Raman
- Koda says he will report to ED only after Jharkhand polls
More  
  Read Business news in 
  Get financial advisory and solutions for your projects
  Holidays starting at a delightful EMI of Rs 3481
  Switch on and say hello to Monday morning !
  Your dream home can now be a reality.
  Visit Fortis for a preventive health check-up & get a 20% discount.
  Follow the ups and downs of your investments. Try our new Portfolio Tracker
  Kolkata Dock \ Freight contract for the British Gurkhas Nepal
  Find how Midsize Businesses use ERP to gain competitive advantage
  Trading in Forex is now as easy as 1-2-3
  Discover an economical and cost effective way to market your products and services
  Giftwithlove.com: Same day delivery of Flowers and Cakes to India
  Download the E-book on the Future of Business Intelligence
  Learn Best Practices for improving customer satisfaction
  Know your customers better... download the free e-book on CRM
   Discussion Board / User Comments    
Display Name  Email-Id  
Post your comment
manesh
The Thop brasses of the indian army only need the commission through the t-90 deal. They even not understanding the national interest.
Reply
arjun_fan
The army is either prejudiced against the Arjun, which is far more superior to the T-90 (which performs well but not well enough in Indian conditions and doesn't suit personnel or war doctrines); or they are unwilling to accept a change in a system they are familiar with; or there exists ulterior motives.
Reply
ex drdo person
Arjun was never a failed project but made one by one excuses story started as india felt that it need of its own tank as t-55 and british tank had overheat problem in desert So project was start but drdo didnot calibrated with army and army top offical take note of it and took their revenge when in 1984 tank was given to army for trail and army rejected the tank each time by put the tank in such a condition that no tank in the world survive (In above 55 degree temperature no engine in world run more than 8 hrs and arjun lasted for 5 hrs) but when drdo in 2005 change its policy by inviting media(headline today and ndtv) for trail then army took new excuses that it to wide and heavy (Till now 2007 they army was sleeping) .But drdo came came with solution by taking T-72 chassis and arjun turret now army say that it needs a futuristic tank(and T-90 is bought for showcasing)
Reply
paranthu63
skagoel is right. Army is trying to dump Arjun in favour of T-90, whereas Airforce may do the same thing for TEJAS in the future. My God, Whether they are going to think about the hardwork people had put in the last 28 years and ARJUN is the only tank in the world which has tested 70000 kms and more than 11000 test firings. But still army is reluctant.
Reply
gagan585
This again hints to the unholy alliance between the brokers, top brass of Army ,MoD and politicians.Its quite clear that DGMF is more interested in kickbacks rather than giving a quality product to its forces.Such nefarious links need to be broken.These elements have systematically stymied growth of indigenous arms industry. There is no clear policy for arms procurement and all deals are struck in a shady manner.Defence is treated as a holy cow which bureaucrats and netas milk to their benefit.
Reply
sandeepfrank
Arjun has a good Armour and i am sure it handles well better than the t 90 or the t 72.... i think there is some thing else behind the scenes.
Reply
paranthu63
Are the people who are supposed to make the decision for purchase are having some other motives? They want the best features from all the tanks and to be fitted in one -Arjun. Why don't they insist on the same for imported ones.
Reply
skageol
THE DGMF ALONGWITH THE CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS WILL NEVER ALLOW OR JUDGE A INDIAN TANK TO BE VEYR GOOD BECAUSE THEN THEY DO NOT GET COMMISSSIONS FROM DALALS/AGENTS/BROKERS OF FOREIGN COMPANIES WHICH RUN INTO THOUSANDS OF CRORES. IN 60 YEARS NO AGGRESSIVE PUSH HAS BEEN MADE TO DEVELOP LOCAL WEAPONRY, BECAUSE WITHOUT BUYING ARMS FROM FOREIGN COMPANIES, THEY CANNOT GET BRIBES AND COMMISSIONS. THIS IS TEH SAD TRUTH BECAUSE OF WHICH INDIA CONTINUES TO BE DEPENDENT ON FOREIGN POWERS.
Reply
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Bharti Airtel slashes roaming rates by 60%
- Govt may allow private sector investment in education
- Network18 lays off 200 staffers
- Suzlon Energy's three promoters pledge 2.8 cr shares
- Patni may host all IT services on 'cloud'
 
 More  
BS Poll
Cast Your Vote
 
   
 
Should India's defence sector be thrown open to foreign investments?
  Yes  No
Submit

  Hot Searches  
 
Amitabh Bachchan | N Chandrasekaran | Swine Flu | Mukesh Ambani | Anil Ambani | TCS | Infosys |  Air India |  Duronto |  Pranab Mukherjee | Sonia Gandhi | Congress | Rahul Gandhi |  Bigg Boss |  New Pension Scheme |  Service tax |  Excise duty |  Sebi | Tech Mahindra |  Ramalinga Raju |  Satyam |  Reliance  |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  |  B-School | DLF  Sensex |  Tax calculator | Home Loan  | Bollywood | Personal Finance |  inflation | oil prices |  World Bank | Reliance Infratel |  HDFC |  Barack Obama  
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring
FOR HOT PRODUCTS
BS Bazaar.com
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Site Map | Contact Us | Feedback