| Court extended Wachovia talks, claims Citigroup | |
| Bloomberg / Charlotte/ New York October 6, 2008, 1:17 IST | |
The deal will give Citigroup the third-biggest US bank network.
Citigroup Inc said a New York state court judge granted an order extending the bank’s “exclusivity agreement” with Wachovia Corp, after Wells Fargo & Co announced a competing bid for the North Carolina lender on Friday. New York State Supreme Court Judge Charles Ramos issued the emergency injunction last night, protracting
Citigroup’s agreement to negotiate the acquisition of parts of Charlotte- North Carolina-based Wachovia “until further order of the court,” Citigroup said in an e-mailed statement. That accord was set to expire tomorrow. The two banks are required to appear before Ramos on October 10, according to the statement.
Hobbled by $61 billion of losses stemming from the collapse of the mortgage market and ensuing credit contraction, Citigroup is in the midst of a takeover battle with Wells Fargo for control of Wachovia. A spokeswoman for Wells Fargo didn’t immediately reply to requests for comment after Citigroup announced the court order.
“Wachovia believes its agreement with Wells Fargo is proper, valid and is in the best interest of shareholders, employees and the American taxpayers,” said Christy Phillips Brown, a Wachovia spokeswoman. “Under that agreement, Citigroup is always free to make a superior offer to Wachovia.”
Citigroup was seeking $60 billion in damages from Wells Fargo in connection with the proposed deal, the New York Times reported, citing a person briefed on the situation.
Citigroup fell as much as 21 per cent Friday in New York trading after Wells Fargo, the biggest US bank on the West Coast, agreed to buy all of Wachovia for $15.1 billion. The bid trumped Citigroup’s government-backed offer of $2.16 billion for Wachovia's banking operations.
Kovacevich, Pandit: “The taxpayer doesn't pay a penny” for the Wells Fargo deal, Wells Chairman Richard Kovacevich, 64, said Friday in an interview. His company's bid is superior to Citigroup's also because it's a higher price and the combining banks “share similar cultures and values.”
Vikram Pandit, Citigroup's chief executive officer, is counting on the Wachovia purchase to help rebuild after three quarters of losses totaling more than $17 billion. The bank’s market value has dropped 38 per cent this year to about $100 billion, leaving it below Wells Fargo. If Wells Fargo winds up with Wachovia, it would creep up on its New York rival with deposits of $787 billion, compared with Citigroup's $826 billion.
Pandit insisted Citigroup will prevail, citing the exclusive agreement signed by Wachovia. Kovacevich told investors during a conference call the deal with Wachovia is “solid.”
Citigroup dropped 18 per cent to $18.35 Friday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, after having its biggest share decline in about 20 years. Wachovia rose 59 per cent to $6.21. Wells Fargo declined 1.7 per cent to $34.56.
Citi’s Claim: Citigroup demanded Wells Fargo abandon the takeover. Buying Wachovia would give Citigroup the third-biggest US bank network and cement its status as the nation's largest lender by assets.
“Any such agreement between Wachovia and Wells Fargo is illegal,” Pandit, 51, said in the e-mail Friday. “We continue to vigorously pursue Citigroup's interest and rights in completing this transaction.”
Citigroup may increase its offer, said a person with knowledge of the deliberations.
“I'm still not convinced that Citigroup can force this sale to happen,” said Elizabeth Nowicki, a professor at Tulane University Law School in New Orleans and a former M&A lawyer at Sullivan & Cromwell. “Citigroup may be facing the chance to get themselves a small settlement, and that's a nice shot in the arm for a company that's struggling.”
Regulators : The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, helped broker Citigroup's purchase when Wachovia's health faltered. Chairman Sheila Bair said until a review of Wells Fargo's offer is completed, the agency will stand behind the Citigroup deal.
“We wanted to make clear that until things are settled with what's going on with this Wells bid, that the Citi deal was still there,” Bair said Friday in an interview on Bloomberg Television's “Political Capital with Al Hunt.” Bair said the FDIC is reviewing the offer, and she told Hunt: “You shouldn't” assume the US opposes Wells's offer.
Other bank regulators said they haven't evaluated Wells Fargo's offer.
“We have not yet reviewed the new Wells Fargo proposal and the issues that it raises,” the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said Friday in a statement.
“The regulators will be working with the parties to achieve an outcome that protects all Wachovia creditors, including depositors, insured and uninsured, and promotes market stability.”
Wells Fargo's Plan : Wells Fargo, run by Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf, had avoided bets on the sub-prime-mortgage market that contributed to $588 billion in writedowns and credit losses for financial firms worldwide. Wachovia in 2006 purchased Oakland, California-based Golden West Financial Corp. for $24 billion, acquiring a portfolio of option-adjustable rate mortgages that helped lead to $9.6 billion in losses this year.
Wells Fargo, in bidding for Wachovia, deviates from a strategy of seeking smaller acquisitions with less risk to fill gaps in its branch network. After the combination, the bank would have $1.42 trillion in assets, which may rank third in the US depending on what other bank mergers are completed. It would have 10,761 branches in 39 states.
“Citi's purchase was too cheap for the assets and operations involved,” said Jason Pride, research director at Haverford Trust Co. in Haverford, Pennsylvania. “It's an excellent strategic deal for Wells Fargo given the geography of the branch network.”
|
Content Guide
