Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment
The Supreme Court of India is considering whether the dispute can be settled through mediation
The Supreme Court has begun hearing in Ram-Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case
For the time being the BJP and the RSS will have to keep the Ram Temple confined to the courts
The petition has contended that Parliament has no legislative competence to acquire land belonging to the state
The Centre's application claimed that only 0.313 acre of land was disputed
It sought modification of the SC order by which the central govt was directed to maintain 'status quo' with regard to the entire land, including the non-disputed acquired plots
A notice sent by the Supreme Court registry to various parties said that the Ayodhya dispute matter will be listed on Jan 29
The Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case has been pending before the apex court for last eight years
Justice Lalit had appeared as a lawyer for then Uttar Pradesh CM Kalyan Singh in 1994
Ayodhya land dispute case: Justice U U Lalit recuses from Ayodhya Bench as Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan points out that he appeared for Kalyan Singh in a related matter
Ayodhya land dispute case: Justice U U Lalit recuses from Ayodhya Bench as Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan points out that he appeared for Kalyan Singh in a related matter
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land title dispute case today. Here is a timeline of the case and various key developments in the story so far
The matter is listed before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul
The Bench is likely to constitute a three-judge Bench for hearing as many as 14 appeals filed against the Allahabad High Court judgement
Hindutva groups have been pressing the government to bring a law to pave the way for the temple's construction in Ayodhya without waiting for the court's verdict
'Our alliance with BJP is based on Hindutva but it seems the BJP has forgotten it'
Any ordinance that will block one side from access to adjudication, while perpetuating the status quo as far as demolition is concerned is likely to be held unconstitutional
Jain became a witness to the Ayodhya case after covering what he felt was a routine assignment for a weekly newspaper
Politicians should not ratchet up rhetoric on Ayodhya