Page 6 - Ayodhya Case

Sunni Waqf Board won't file review petition against SC's Ayodhya verdict

In a unanimous verdict on November 9, the Supreme Court had paved the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya.

Muslim law board to file review plea before Dec 9 against Ayodhya verdict

"The board is firm on its decision to file a review petition in the Supreme Court and we have time till December 9 for doing so," Secretary of the Board Zafaryab Jilani told PTI.

SC's Ayodhya verdict: Jamiat ready with review plea, to file on Dec 3-4

Jamiat chief Maulana Arshad Madani had said last week that the Supreme Court's Ayodhya verdict is 'not based on evidence and logic'

Jamiat Ulema to file review plea against SC's Ayodhya verdict on Monday

Jamiat had formed a five-member panel comprising legal experts and religious scholars to look into every aspect of the Supreme Court's November 9 verdict.

Ayodhya verdict: Congress wants grand temple to be built, says Sachin Pilot

Speaking about the Congress' performance in the recent civic body polls in Rajasthan and assembly elections in some states, Pilot said there is a change in the country's atmosphere.

Amit Shah slams Congress over Artcle 370, Ayodhya verdict in Jharkhand

The BJP leader also accused the Congress-JMM combine of indulging in corruption and 'hoodwinking' the tribals and the poor

Ayodhya verdict: Shia Board objects to allotment of 5-acre land to Sunnis

Yesterday also Rizmi urged Centre to include his community in Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019 claiming that the Shia Muslim community has been facing religious discrimination in several countries.

Ayodhya verdict: Security beefed up to maintain law, eye on social media

A posse of 40 armed CAPF companies (about 4,000 personnel) were put on full operational readiness in UP and areas in and around Ayodhya district, a senior CAPF officer said

SC to hear pleas seeking review of Ayodhya verdict in-chamber today

The in-chamber proceeding will be taken up by a bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde and also comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, S A Nazeer and Sanjeev Khanna.

Ram Janma Bhoomi-Babri Masjid land title dispute: Verdict explained

In a unanimous judgment, the Bench has allotted the land to the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas for construction of a temple

Being a constitutional court

The current trend of hearing high profile cases end to end should be carried forward

Year in Review: Citizenship Act to Ayodhya verdict, key decisions of 2019

Days before curtains come down on 2019, we look at the key decisions and ideas that shaped the year

Ayodhya dispute: SC commences day-to-day hearing after mediation talks fail

The bench comprises CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer

Security of 5 judges who delivered Ayodhya verdict enhanced: Officials

Now the mobile component of the security has been added and an escort vehicle with armed guards will accompany each judge's vehicle

SC to hear, decide sensitive cases like Ayodhya, Rafale on reopening

The top court, which would function with its full judicial strength of 31 judges under the stewardship of CJI Ranjan Gogoi, is likely to deliver its verdict in the review pleas in Rafale case

Modi invokes fall of Berlin Wall, says shun fear and unite for new India

He said peace, unity and amity are essential for development of India and described November 9 as a day to forget any bitterness one may have

The Ayodhya case timeline: Events leading up to the historic judgment

Here is a timeline of events explaining the centuries-long Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya

Shekhar Gupta: Mandir done, miles to go

Modi's stature could be dented if India's economy doesn't break out of its chronic stall. He needs grand ideas to end the slide or risk more emotional populism

Ayodhya, polytheism and the rule of law

Why Solomon would have been proud of the Supreme Court judgment in the Ayodhya land dispute case

Disputed Ayodhya land goes to Ram, Sunni board to be given a separate site

'Dividing the land will not subserve the interest of either of the parties or secure a lasting sense of peace and tranquility,' the judgment said