You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

India should resist misleading allure of domestic mkt; boost exports: Study

India should resist the misleading allure of the domestic market and should zealously boost exports, according to a research paper co-authored by former chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian

Topics
domestic market | Exports | Indian Economy

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

exports, imports, trade, RCEP

India should resist the misleading allure of the and should zealously boost exports, according to a research paper co-authored by former chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian.

The paper, jointly authored by Subramanian and Pennsylvania State University professor Shoumitro Chatterjee, said India is turning inward, domestic demand is assuming primacy over export orientation and trade restrictions are increasing, reversing a three-decade trend.

"Resisting the misleading allure of the domestic market, India should zealously boost export performance and deploy all means to achieve that," said the paper, titled 'India's Inward (Re)Turn: Is it Warranted? Will it Work?'.

It added that abandoning export orientation will amount to killing the goose that lays golden eggs and indeed to killing the only goose laying eggs. "Alas, to embrace aatmanirbharta (self-reliance) is to choose to condemn the to mediocrity."

Further, it said the consensus to favour an inward orientation was emerging even before COVID-19 had struck India, reflected in increasing calls to 'atmanirbharta'.

This shift is based on three misconceptions India's size is big; India's growth has been based on domestic markets not exports; and export prospects are dim because the world is deglobalising, it noted.

The paper also said India still enjoys large export opportunities, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as clothing and footwear, but exploiting these opportunities requires more openness and more global integration.

"Indeed, given constraints on public, corporate and household balance sheets, abandoning export orientation is akin to killing the only goose that can lay eggs," it said.

The paper added that India's real market size, defined as consumers with a modicum of purchasing power, is not big.

"It is much smaller than the headline GDP number, much smaller than China's, and only a small fraction of the world market. The reason is that India has many poor consumers while the rich tend to be large savers, limiting their consumption," it added.

Similarly, the prognosis that export prospects are dim because the world is deglobalising is overly pessimistic, the paper pointed out.

To begin with, it is unclear whether the world is really deglobalising, at least in services. Even if it is, India's export share is so small, even smaller than Vietnam in manufacturing exports, that its could grow rapidly by gaining market share, according to the paper.

In particular, the paper said India has major unexploited opportunities in low-skill manufacturing and services, which it could exploit in the post-COVID-19 environment where firms are looking to exit China and diversify their sources of supply.

"Meanwhile, protectionism is unlikely to succeed as an export strategy because exploiting the big opportunities in the key labour-intensive sectors requires more openness and more global integration, as the experience of China and Vietnam have shown," it said.

In another jointly authored paper titled 'India's Export-Led Growth: Exemplar and Exception, Subramanian and Chatterjee said that contrary to perception, India has been an exemplar of the export-led growth model.

"Since early 1990s, India has posted the world's third-highest growth rate in overall and manufacturing exports, which has been critical to India's overall growth performance," the paper said.

The paper pointed out that India's overall export and growth performance in the past three decades have been East Asian Tigeresque, but with a difference.

"Despite being a low-skill labour-abundant country, India's of high-skill manufacturing goods and services grew more rapidly than low-skill manufacturing such as apparel, textiles, leather, and footwear. Most models of international trade would have predicted the opposite," it said.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Wed, October 14 2020. 18:35 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.