You are here: Home » International » News » Economy
Business Standard

Coal-fired power plants to close after new wastewater rule

The new wastewater rule requires power plants to clean coal ash and toxic heavy metals

Topics
coal industry | coal projects | Coal power

AP  |  Washington 

coal
Photo: Bloomberg

Climate change isn't what's driving some US coal-fired power plants to shut down. It's the expense of stricter pollution controls on their wastewater.

Dozens of plants nationwide plan to stop burning coal this decade to comply with more stringent federal wastewater guidelines, according to state regulatory filings, as the industry continues moving away from the planet-warming fossil fuel to make electricity.

The new wastewater rule requires power plants to clean coal ash and toxic heavy metals such as mercury, arsenic and selenium from plant wastewater before it is dumped into streams and rivers.

The rule is expected to affect 75 coal-fired power plants nationwide, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Those plants had an October deadline to tell their state regulators how they planned to comply, with options that included upgrading their pollution-control equipment or retiring their coal-fired generating units by 2028.

The national impact of the wastewater rule is still coming into focus, but at least 26 plants in 14 states said they will stop burning coal, according to the Sierra Club, which has been tracking state regulatory filings.

Twenty-one of the plants intend to shut down, and five indicated they may switch to natural gas, the environmental group said.

The free ride these plants have been getting is ending in a lot of ways, said Zack Fabish, a Sierra Club lawyer.

And them choosing to retire by 2028 probably reflects the reality that a lot of the subsidies they have been getting in terms of being able to dump their wastewater into the commons, they are not going to be able to do that in the future."

The rule will reduce the discharge of pollutants into the nation's waterways by about 386 million pounds annually, according to EPA estimates.

It's expected to cost plant operators, collectively, nearly USD 200 million per year to implement.

Those that intend to close include two of Pennsylvania's largest coal-fired power plants, Keystone and Conemaugh outside Pittsburgh, which said they will stop using coal and retire all of their generating units by December 31, 2028, according to regulatory notices obtained separately by The Associated Press.

The plants opened more than 50 years ago and together employ about 320 full-time workers and 170 contractors. They generate enough power for perhaps 1.5 million homes, according to industry averages for coal plants of their size.

In addition to Pennsylvania, states with power plants that plan to stop using coal by 2028 are Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia, the Sierra Club data shows.

Power producers that say they will shutter coal-fired units as a result of the new rule include Atlanta-based Southern Co. and Houston-based NRG.

Southern, which operates electric utilities in Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, said it will shutter two-thirds of its coal fleet, including units at the nation's two largest coal-fired power plants, Scherer and Bowen, both in Georgia.

NRG said it plans to stop burning coal at its domestic plants outside Texas, and install new pollution controls at its two Texas plants.

The electric power sector has spent years transitioning from coal to cheaper, cleaner-burning natural gas and renewables like wind and solar.

Nationwide, about 30 per cent of generating capacity at coal plants has been retired since 2010, according to the Energy Information Administration.

(Coal use at power plants is expected to surge more than 20 per cent this year because of sharply higher natural gas prices the first such increase since 2014 but the energy agency said it expects that trend to be temporary.)


The long-term move away from coal has been pronounced in Pennsylvania, the nation's No. 3 coal-producing state after Wyoming and West Virginia.

Coal's share of electrical power generation in the state declined from nearly half in 2010 to 10 per cent last year, with operators taking advantage of a statewide boom in natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale, the nation's largest gas field. Seventeen Pennsylvania coal plants have been retired since 2009.

The smallest, oldest (coal) plants were generally the ones the economics killed first. They were too expensive and too small to be retrofitted to meet new EPA standards, said Jean Reaves Rollins, president of The C Three Group, a market research firm focused on energy infrastructure and utilities.

She said coal plants in competitive electricity markets like Pennsylvania's have also come under pressure.

It is clear in the case of the two Pennsylvania plants, the cost of compliance will put them out of the economic running," she said.

Pennsylvania and neighboring Ohio have accounted for 20 per cent of all coal-fuelled power plant shutdowns in the US in recent years, according to federal data.

The Keystone and Conemaugh plants are owned by a consortium of private investors, with Texas-based power producer Talen Energy also holding a stake. Talen referred questions to the plants' chief operating officer, who did not return phone calls and emails.

Industry officials contend the mothballing of so many coal plants carries consequences for the nation's electric grid.

Michelle Bloodworth, president and CEO of America's Power, a trade organisation that advocates on behalf of coal-fueled electricity, cited recent blackouts in Texas and elsewhere as examples of what happens when you go too far too fast.

We are monitoring the situation currently but we do remain concerned that overly aggressive policies that lead to the premature retirement of dispatchable generation like the coal fleet will jeopardize the reliability and resilience of the electricity grid, Bloodworth said.

Experts have pointed out that in the case of last winter's massive Texas blackout, most of the megawatts that went offline were generated by gas, coal and nuclear plants.

In Pennsylvania, the planned retirements of Keystone and Conemaugh come as building trade unions, industry groups and coal communities fight the state's planned entry into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a multi-state consortium that imposes a price on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants that use coal, gas and oil.

Pennsylvania would be the first major fossil fuel state to adopt such a carbon pricing policy.

David Masur, executive director of PennEnvironment, an environmental group, said the closures show that with or without policies to reduce carbon pollution, the companies who own these antiquated power plants intend to shut them down or convert many of them anyway.

The planned shutdowns could leave Homer City Generating Station as the last large, traditional coal-fired power plant in the state still operating by decade's end.

Homer City, which is east of Pittsburgh and is the largest coal plant in Pennsylvania, has told state regulators it plans to keep operating and abide by the new wastewater limits.

Owners of shuttering plants are responsible for environmental cleanup, according to the EPA.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Tue, November 23 2021. 02:27 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.