Page 27 - Tata Sons

SC stays NCLAT order restoring Cyrus Mistry as Tata Sons' chairman

A bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant agreed to hear Tata Sons' plea challenging the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) decision

Tata vs Mistry: SC to hear petition challenging NCLAT decision today

The matter is listed before a bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant where a battery of top senior advocates are likely to represent both the sides

Top events: Infosys Q3, Khelo India, SC verdict on curbs in J&K, and more

Business Standard brings you top events that are lined up for Friday

MCA vs NCLAT: Truce or war?

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's latest judgment on the RoC application in the Tata-Mistry case has made the fight interesting on many counts

Now, TCS moves SC against NCLAT order reinstating Mistry as director

In a major development, the NCLAT had restored Mistry as executive chairman of Tata Sons and ruled that appointment of N Chandrasekaran as the head was illega

SC to hear Tata Sons' plea challenging NCLAT decision on Mistry on Friday

The apex court website on Tuesday showed the plea to be listed before a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant

TCS board won't meet on January 9; Q3 results likely after SC hearing

SC will hear the petition filed by Tata Sons on January 10

NCLAT upholds its judgment in Tata-Mistry case, dismisses RoC plea

In its order dated December 18, the NCLAT had said Tata Sons had hurriedly changed its status to private company from public 'with the help of the Registrar of Companies'

Tata Sons doesn't mention plea in SC against NCLAT decision on Cyrus Mistry

A lawyer associated with the matter had said earlier that the appeal against the NCALT decision would be mentioned for early listing on reopening of the apex court after the winter break

Nature of Tata Sons' partnership lies at the heart of Tata-Mistry drama

Ratan Tata does not think Tata Sons is 'quasi-partnership'; Cyrus Mistry does. The SC will have to sort out the vexed issue

And now, Ratan Tata moves SC against NCLAT order restoring Cyrus Mistry

The Chairman Emeritus said Mistry was not hired as representative of Shapoorji Pallonji group

NCLAT won't change its judgment in Tata Sons case; will clarify RoC's role

RoC counsel told the Tribunal that they were merely following orders of the NCLT

Twist in corporate drama: Tata's financial shape worse than in FY15, FY19

The analysis is based on the annual audited consolidated finances of all listed Tata Group firms for the respective financial years

Tata Sons case: NCLAT ready to expunge remarks against RoC; seeks details

NCLAT adjourned the hearing till tomorrow and has sought clarification from RoC on what constitutes a private company

Cyrus Mistry actions hurt Tata group interests, Tata Sons tells SC

In restoring Cyrus Mistry, NCLAT failed to consider the implications of the order, Tata Sons said in their appeal

Cyrus Mistry case: Tata Trusts nominees did not exceed their brief, SC told

The Tata Trusts holds 66 per cent stake in Tata Sons - the holding company of Tata Group companies - and Ratan Tata is the chairman of the Trusts

Cyrus Mistry unlikely to take up a board position, may appoint nominees

Mistry and his team are reviewing the legal situation

Tata Sons move SC, challenges NCLAT order restoring Mistry as chairman

Tata Sons on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging the December 18 decision of the NCLAT restoring Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of the group. The Tata Group sought stay of the verdict by which the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled as "illegal" the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as head of the holding company of over USD 110 billion salt-to-software conglomerate. "We have challenged the NCLAT decision in its entirety," a lawyer associated with the matter said. The petition has sought a direction from the apex court to set aside or quash the findings of the tribunal which held that the group's chairman emeritus Ratan Tata's actions against Mistry were oppressive. The NCLAT had stayed the operation of the judgement with respect to reinstatement of Mistry for four weeks to allow the Tatas to appeal. The NCLAT had also quashed the conversion of Tata Sons into a private company from a public firm. It also directed Tata Sons not to take any action

Tata vs Mistry: NCLAT restores Cyrus Mistry as chairman of Tata Sons

While restoring Mistry to the position, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as executive chairman was illegal

NCLAT ruling on Mistry: Order raises questions on corporate governance

Ratan Tata will have to take a backseat, considering the strictures passed by the NCLAT