You are here: Home » International » News » Companies
Business Standard

US Supreme Court blocks Texas law targeting social media firms' rules

The US Supreme Court has blocked a Texas law that would ban large social media companies from removing posts based on the views they express

Topics
US Supreme Court | Texas | Social Media

IANS  |  San Francisco 

US Supreme Court

The has blocked a law that would ban large from removing posts based on the views they express.

According to the New York Times, the court's brief order was unsigned and gave no reasons, which is typical when the justices act on emergency applications.

The order was not the last word in the case, which is pending before a federal appeals court and may return to the Supreme Court.

The vote was 5 to 4, with an unusual coalition in dissent. The court's three most conservative members -- Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch -- filed a dissent saying they would have let stand, for now at least, an appeals court order that left the law in place while the case moved forward. Justice Elena Kagan, a liberal, also said she would have let the order stand, though she did not join the dissent and gave no reasons of her own.

Justice Alito wrote that the issues were so novel and significant that the Supreme Court would have to consider them at some point, the report said.

"This application concerns issues of great importance that will plainly merit this court's review," he wrote. " platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news. At issue is a groundbreaking law that addresses the power of dominant corporations to shape public discussion of the important issues of the day," he added.

Justice Alito said he was skeptical of the argument that social media have editorial discretion protected by the First Amendment like that enjoyed by newspapers and other traditional publishers.

The law's supporters said the measure was an attempt to combat what they called Silicon Valley censorship, saying major platforms had removed posts expressing conservative views.

The law was prompted in part by the decisions of some platforms to bar President Donald J. Trump after January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

The law, H.B. 20, applies to social media platforms with more than 50 million active monthly users, including Facebook, and YouTube. It does not appear to reach smaller platforms that appeal to conservatives, like Truth Social and Gettr, the law's challengers told the Supreme Court.

--IANS

vc/shb/

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Wed, June 01 2022. 10:36 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.